Miguel

Miguel v. Yue

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20243:23-cv-06350California2,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH MIGUEL, Case No. 23-cv-06350-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT;

AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO

KATIE YUE, et al., FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Defendants.

12 Before the Court are three motions to dismiss plaintiff Joseph Miguel's ("Miguel") Amended Complaint ("AC"): (1) County of Alameda's ("the County") Motion to Dismiss, filed March 29, 2024, as amended April 8, 2024; (2) Steven Corral's ("Corral") Motion to Dismiss, filed May 15, 2024; and (3) Ivan Toscano ("Toscano") and Kenneth Evoniuk's ("Evoniuk") Motion to Dismiss, filed June 19, 2024. Miguel has filed opposition to the motions filed by the County and by Toscano/Evoniuk, and said defendants have filed replies thereto; Miguel has not filed opposition to Corral's Motion. Also before the Court is Miguel's "Motion for Default Judgment," filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.