Cross

Cross v. Central Contra Costa Transit Authority

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20244:21-cv-01312California801 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHANNON CROSS, Case No. 21-cv-01312-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER

AUTHORITY, PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE

SEALED Defendant. Re: ECF No. 80 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to consider whether another party’s material should be sealed. ECF No. 80. Defendant filed a response pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(f). ECF No. 84. Plaintiff has agreed to withdraw Exhibit B109 as not relevant to the summary judgment motion. ECF No. 91. Defendant argues that the Court should exclude Exhibit Nos. B22–33, 43, and 48–120, because they were not properly referenced in Plaintiff’s opposition. ECF No. 90 at 3–4. Upon review, the Court finds that Plaintiff sufficiently identified this evidence and denies Defendant’s request to exclude it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.