United States v. Adobe, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20245:24-cv-03630California1,095 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 24-cv-03630-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER

ADOBE, INC., MANINDER SAWHNEY, PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE and DAVID WADHWANI, SEALED 11 Defendants. [Re: ECF 33]

13 Plaintiff United States of America (“the United States”) sues Adobe, Inc. and two of its executives (collectively, “Defendants”) under the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, alleging that Defendants enroll consumers in Adobe subscription plans without adequate disclosure of plan terms and utilize onerous cancellation procedures to trap consumers into subscriptions they no longer want. See Compl., ECF 32. This order addresses the United States’ administrative motion to consider whether material in its complaint should be sealed based on Defendants’ designation of the material as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.