Loaiza
Loaiza v. Arzola
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID B. LOAIZA,
Case No. 24-cv-01758 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND
v.
JUAN ARZOLA, et al., 11 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff, a California parolee, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be addressed in a separate order. 17 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro se pleadings must,…