Garrick

Garrick v. Garrick

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20244:22-cv-04549California7,951 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OWEN GARRICK, Case No. 22-cv-04549-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS

JOCELYN FREEMAN GARRICK, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 48, 52 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are Defendants’ anti-SLAPP motions to strike and motions to dismiss Plaintiff Owen Garrick’s second amended pro se complaint. ECF Nos. 48, 52. The Court will grant the motion to dismiss the federal claims and decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The Court accepts the following allegations from the second amended complaint (“SAC”) as true and views them in the light most favorable to Plaintiff. Oregon Clinic, PC v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 75 F.4th 1064, 1067 (9th Cir. 2023). Owen Garrick (“Garrick”) and Jocelyn Freeman Garrick (“Freeman Garrick”) are physicians in Alameda County. ECF No. 46 ¶ 20. Together they founded Mentoring in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.