Garrick
Garrick v. Garrick
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OWEN GARRICK, Case No. 22-cv-04549-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS
JOCELYN FREEMAN GARRICK, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 48, 52 Defendants.
12 Before the Court are Defendants’ anti-SLAPP motions to strike and motions to dismiss Plaintiff Owen Garrick’s second amended pro se complaint. ECF Nos. 48, 52. The Court will grant the motion to dismiss the federal claims and decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The Court accepts the following allegations from the second amended complaint (“SAC”) as true and views them in the light most favorable to Plaintiff. Oregon Clinic, PC v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 75 F.4th 1064, 1067 (9th Cir. 2023). Owen Garrick (“Garrick”) and Jocelyn Freeman Garrick (“Freeman Garrick”) are physicians in Alameda County. ECF No. 46 ¶ 20. Together they founded Mentoring in…