Randle

Randle v. Antioch Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20243:23-cv-05800California1,155 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAMELLO D. RANDLE, Case No. 23-cv-05800-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND

v. OF SERVICE

ANTIOCH POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Martinez Detention Facility proceeding without representation by an attorney, filed this civil rights action under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 28, 2024, the Court reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and found, when liberally construed, it stated a claim that is capable of judicial determination against three officers of the Antioch Police Department –- Sergeant Wisecarver and Offices Marcotte and Rambaugh –- for using excessive force during his arrest. (ECF No. 8 at 6-7.) The Court found the remaining claims did not state a claim capable of judicial determination and granted Plaintiff until June 28, 2024, to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 8:21-23.) Plaintiff was warned that if he did not file an amended complaint, all claims apart from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.