Russell

El Bey v. Russell

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20243:23-cv-00107California1,038 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFERY DEAN HERSEY EL BEY, Case No. 23-cv-00107-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DISMISSAL FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

J. RUSSELL, Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff initiated and is prosecuting this civil rights excessive force action without the benefit of an attorney. Defendant answered the complaint as narrowed by the Court. Plaintiff did not appear at the initial case management conference held on March 28, 2024, and did not participate in filing a joint case management conference statement. The Court nonetheless issued a pretrial order adopting the case schedule Defendant proposed. (Dkt. Nos. 28, 29.) The pretrial order scheduled a further case management conference for July 11, 2024. (Dkt. No. 29 at 1.) According to Defendant’s further case management conference statement filed July 3, 2024, Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant’s communications regarding submission of a joint case management conference…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.