Washington v. Superior Court Jury Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20243:24-cv-01344California269 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 BRETZ WASHINGTON, Case No. 24-cv-01344-TSH Plaintiff, y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE SUPERIOR COURT JURY SERVICES, et al., Defendants. 10 Pending before the Court is Defendant Superior Court of California’s motion to dismiss. qe ECF No. 17. Plaintiff Bretz Washington failed to file an opposition in compliance with Civil || Local Rule 7. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve 14 || the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 || (1962). Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the August 22, 2024 noticed hearing date and || ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute || and failure to comply with court deadlines. Plaintiff shall file a declaration by August 7, 2024 and simultaneously file either an opposition in compliance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.