Wynn

Wynn v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20245:23-cv-06044California2,974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 BRITTANY WYNN, Case No. 23-cv-06044-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., IN PART; GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

Defendant. STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

12 [Re: ECF No. 25]

14 Plaintiff Brittany Wynn brings three claims against Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) related to her brief employment at UPS. ECF No. 22 (“FAC”). Defendant moves to both dismiss and strike class allegations for each of Plaintiff’s claims. ECF No. 25 (“Mot.”); ECF No. 35 (“Reply”). Plaintiff opposes the motion. ECF No. 29 (“Opp.”). The Court held a hearing on July 18, 2024. For the reasons described below and on the record, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART. Defendant’s motion to strike class…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.