Addington

Addington v. PG&E Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20244:23-cv-05099California2,728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ADDINGTON, Case No. 23-cv-05099-HSG

Appellant, ORDER AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY

COURT

v. Re: Dkt. No. 4 PG&E CORPORATION, Appellee.

12 Pending before the Court is pro se Appellant David P. Addington’s appeal from the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment and denial of his motion for reconsideration. Dkt. No. 1. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court AFFIRMS. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The dispute between Mr. Addington and PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (collectively, “PG&E”) involves two electric transmission towers located in Mr. Addington’s backyard in Piedmont, California. The towers were built and previously maintained by PG&E’s predecessor, Great Western Power Company, pursuant to a 1908 utility easement. See Dkt. No. 6-2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.