Addington
Addington v. PG&E Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ADDINGTON, Case No. 23-cv-05099-HSG
Appellant, ORDER AFFIRMING BANKRUPTCY
COURT
v. Re: Dkt. No. 4 PG&E CORPORATION, Appellee.
12 Pending before the Court is pro se Appellant David P. Addington’s appeal from the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment and denial of his motion for reconsideration. Dkt. No. 1. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court AFFIRMS. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The dispute between Mr. Addington and PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (collectively, “PG&E”) involves two electric transmission towers located in Mr. Addington’s backyard in Piedmont, California. The towers were built and previously maintained by PG&E’s predecessor, Great Western Power Company, pursuant to a 1908 utility easement. See Dkt. No. 6-2…