Pandolfi

Pandolfi v. AviaGames, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20243:23-cv-05971California7,279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDREW PANDOLFI, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05971-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING AVIA

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION

AVIAGAMES, INC., et al., Defendants. Docket No.

12 Plaintiffs Andrew Pandolfi and Mandi Shawcroft have filed suit against AviaGames, Inc. (“Avia”) and its co-founders (collectively, the “Avia Defendants”), as well as two companies that invested in Avia. The Avia Defendants have moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act. Previously, the Court addressed some of the issues raised in the motion to compel but deferred a final ruling so that the parties could provide supplemental briefing. Having considered that supplemental briefing, as well as all other briefing and documents related to the motion to compel, the Court hereby DENIES the Avia Defendants’ motion. I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A. First Amended Complaint In the operative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.