Udo
Udo v. Bank of America, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ETOP UDO, et al., Case No. 24-cv-01310-LJC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
BANK OF AMERICA , N.A., et al., Defendants.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Etop Udo and Legal Task Help, LLC bring several claims against Defendants Bank of America, N.A.; U.S. Bank; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; and Bank of the West. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed sua sponte for failure to serve process within the time allowed, and based on the res judicata effect of a previous case filed by Udo, Case No. 23-cv-02935-JSW. II. FAILURE TO SERVE “If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). This case was filed…