Vericool World LLC v. Igloo Products Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VERICOOL WORLD LLC, Case No. 22-cv-02440-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND DENYING
v. MOTION TO REVIEW COSTS
IGLOO PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. Nos. 68, 80 Defendant.
12 In December 2023, the Court granted Defendant Igloo Products Corporation’s motion for summary judgment and denied Plaintiff Vericool World LLC’s motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 60. The Court concluded that Plaintiff had not established that it had a viable claim under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B), or California’s Unfair Competition Law, Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. Now pending before the Court are two post-judgment motions: Defendant filed a motion for attorneys’ fees, Dkt. No. 68, and Plaintiff filed a motion to review the taxed costs, Dkt. No. 80. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). …