Vericool World LLC v. Igloo Products Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20244:22-cv-02440California1,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VERICOOL WORLD LLC, Case No. 22-cv-02440-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND DENYING

v. MOTION TO REVIEW COSTS

IGLOO PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. Nos. 68, 80 Defendant.

12 In December 2023, the Court granted Defendant Igloo Products Corporation’s motion for summary judgment and denied Plaintiff Vericool World LLC’s motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 60. The Court concluded that Plaintiff had not established that it had a viable claim under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B), or California’s Unfair Competition Law, Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq. Now pending before the Court are two post-judgment motions: Defendant filed a motion for attorneys’ fees, Dkt. No. 68, and Plaintiff filed a motion to review the taxed costs, Dkt. No. 80. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.