Dorsey

Dorsey v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20243:23-cv-01995California9,069 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 M.D., Case No. 23-cv-01995-LJC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT AND DENYING

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

MARTIN O’MALLEY1, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. Re: ECF Nos. 14, 16

12 Plaintiff M.D.2 challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for disability insurance benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Both parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction (ECF Nos. 7, 10) and moved for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 14, 16. M.D. filed a reply in support of her Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 18. Having considered the parties’ briefing, and for the reasons discussed below, M.D.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings. I. BACKGROUND A. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.