Johnson v. City of Santa Rosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20243:23-cv-02478California1,692 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN PAUL JOHNSON, Case No. 23-cv-02478-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 44 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff brings this excessive force action against the City of Santa Rosa and four individual defendants. (Dkt. No. 21.) The City of Santa Rosa, Officer Cody Sousa, Officer Christopher O’Neill, and Sergeant Hector Deleon (“Defendants”) move to compel Plaintiff’s responses to Defendants’ discovery requests and for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 37(d) (“Rule 37”). (Dkt. No. 44.) Having carefully considered the briefing, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L. R. 7-1(b), and DENIES both Defendants’ motion to compel and motion for sanctions. BACKGROUND A. Complaint Allegations On May 23, 2022, Officer Sousa arrested Plaintiff after a foot chase. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.