Doe

Doe v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20243:23-cv-00501California674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00501-AMO

Plaintiffs, ORDER TERMINATING MOTION

FOR ORDER ENJOINING

v. DEFENDANT GOODRX FROM

FURTHER VIOLATING COURT

GOODRX HOLDINGS, INC., et al., ORDER, DISCHARGING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE, AND DENYING

Defendants. MOTION TO SEVER Re: Dkt. Nos. 151, 152, 175

This order resolves Plaintiffs’ motion for an order enjoining Defendant GoodRx from further violating a court order, ECF 151, the order to show cause issued November 2, 2023, ECF 152, and Meta’s motion to sever, ECF 175. In light of the agreement in principle to settle Plaintiffs’ claims against GoodRx, see ECF 205 at 2, the motion for an order enjoining GoodRx from further violating a court order is TERMINATED AS MOOT, and the November 2, 2023 order to show cause is HEREBY DISCHARGED. For the reasons that follow, Meta’s motion to sever is DENIED. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 permits courts to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.