Tingle
Tingle v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AARON KRISTOPHER TINGLE, Case No. 24-cv-00929-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART REQUEST FOR
v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendants.
12 Plaintiff, a prisoner housed at Santa Rita Jail, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 17, 2024, the Court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim because inter alia the complaint only offered vague and conclusory allegations; it was unclear what happened; the complaint violated the joinder rule set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2); and the complaint’s allegations that he had been wrongfully convicted were likely barred by the Heck doctrine. Dkt. No. 9. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint to address the identified deficiencies, and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by July 15, 2024 or face dismissal of this action. Id. …