Tavantzis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANA MARIA MARCELA TAVANTZIS, et Case No. 23-cv-05607-BLF (SVK) al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 78

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,

11 Defendant. 12 The Parties present the Court with a relatively workaday discovery dispute—a request to 13 compel further discovery from Defendant American Airlines, Inc. (“AA”)—with an added twist: 14 the Transportation Security Administration (the “TSA”). See Dkt. 78 (the “Joint Letter”). 15 Specifically, Plaintiffs seek to compel AA to provide further responses and documents in 16 connection with three discovery requests: 17 • Interrogatory 3. A request for AA to “[i]dentify and describe” its internal policies and 18 procedures for handling passengers’ medical complications that arise while on one of AA’s 19 aircraft. See id. at 1. 20 • Request For Production (“RFP”) 19. A request for AA to produce its policies and 21 procedures concerning passengers’ medical complications that arise “at any time before, 22 during, or after a flight,” including those…