Merritt

Merritt v. Housing and Urban Development

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20243:24-cv-03968California350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARDY MERRITT, Case No. 24-cv-03968-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 By order filed July 16, 2024, the Court dismissed the above-titled action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and, for the same reason, denied plaintiff's motion for an injunction, whereby plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, sought an order enjoining an unlawful detainer proceeding pending in state court. Now before the Court is plaintiff's "Affidavit in Support of Motion for Reconsideration," filed July 19, 2024, whereby plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the order denying his motion for an injunction. In support of such request, plaintiff provides additional factual detail regarding his contention that the state court made errors in the course of the above-referenced state court action and asserts reconsideration is proper in light of those…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.