Hanan
Hanan v. USCIS
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OFIR HANAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02414-HSG Plaintiffs, ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR y SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 24 U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), et al., Defendants. a
Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos.
v 22, 24. In the months since the parties filed their motions, the Supreme Court decided two © landmark cases that may be relevant to the resolution of the cross-motions: Loper Bright Q 16 || Enterprises v. Raimondo, 144 S. Ct. 2244 (2024) and Department of State v. Mufioz, 144 S. Ct.
= 1812 (2024). Given the changed legal landscape, the Court DIRECTS the parties to file
18 || simultaneous supplemental briefs of no more than 10 pages addressing the impact of Loper Bright || and Mufoz on the issues raised in the cross-motions for summary judgment. The supplemental 20 || briefs shall be filed…