M.R.
M.R. v. Federal Correctional Institution "FCI" Dublin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 || M.R., ET AL., Case No. 4:22-cv-5137-YGR Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL
ORDER Vv. Re: Dkt. No. 179
UNITED STATES, ET AL.,
° Defendants. 10 1] On March 27, 2024, plaintiffs filed their Motion for Relief from Non-dispositive Pretrial 12 || Order (Dkt. No. 179), seeking relief from Magistrate Judge Tse’s March 13, 2024 Order 13 || Permitting Experts to Enter BOP Facilities to Conduct Evaluations on Plaintiffs (Dkt. No. 170). 14 || The Court having considered the motion and all related papers, DENIES the motion for relief. A motion for relief from a non-dispositive order should only be granted when the moving 16 || party establishes that the non-dispositive order by the magistrate judge is clearly erroneous or 17 || contrary to law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; see Bhan v. NME Hospitals, Inc., 929 F.2d 1404, 1414 (9th 18 ||…