Eugenio

Rimas Eugenio v. Eugenio

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20244:23-cv-02832California2,773 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHERYL MAY RIMAS EUGENIO, Case No. 23-cv-02832-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

JOHNNY BENSON EUGENIO, Re: Dkt. No. 66 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees. Dkt. No. 66. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion, and awards attorneys’ fees in the amount of $28,920. I. BACKGROUND Since the Court provided extensive factual background in its May 1, 2024 order granting Ms. Rimas’ motion for summary judgment, it will summarize only the most germane points here. See Dkt. No. 62. On June 8, 2023, Sheryl May Rimas Eugenio (“Ms. Rimas” or “Plaintiff”) filed suit against her ex-husband, Johnny…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.