Curtis F. Robinson M.D. Inc. v. MultiPlan, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20243:24-cv-02993California811 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FILE \

Matthew F. Kennelly Judge: M. David Weisman ynyTED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL 8/ 1/ 202 Case: 24cv6795 THOMES BRET □□□□□ . on CLERK, \

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: MULTIPLAN HEALTH INSURANCE

PROVIDER LITIGATION MDL No. 3121

TRANSFER ORDER

Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs in three Northern District of Illinois actions move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in that district. This litigation consists of six actions pending in three districts, as listed on Schedule A. In addition, the parties have informed the Panel of eighteen potentially-related actions pending in two districts.! All responding parties agree that the actions should proceed together in one court, but they differ as to the mechanism for transfer and their preferred transferee forum. Plaintiff in one Northern District of Illinois potential tag-along action supports the motion. Plaintiffs in eighteen actions and potential tag-along actions support or do not oppose Section 1407 centralization in the Southern…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.