Mattingly

Mattingly v. Justice

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20243:24-cv-03061California1,528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARGURIETE MATTINGLY, Case No. 24-cv-03061-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

HILLARY CARLVIN JUSTICE, Docket No. 9 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff Marguriete Mattingly, as successor trustee of the Leabig Trust, initiated this suit in state court against Defendant Hillary Carlvin Justice. Ms. Mattingly asserted a claim for unlawful detainer and stated that the amount demanded did not exceed $10,000. Mr. Justice, proceeding pro se, removed the case from state to federal court. Now pending before the Court is Ms. Mattingly’s motion to remand. Having considered the papers submitted, the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The motion to remand is GRANTED.1 I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Both parties have provided the Court with a copy of the complaint in the case. In the complaint, Ms. Mattingly alleges as follows. 23 24 25 1 After the motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.