Bonazza

Bonazza v. MUFG Bank, Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20243:23-cv-01161California3,605 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL ALAN BONAZZA,

Case No. 23-cv-01161-JCS Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND

MUFG BANK, LTD., EXPUNGING SECOND ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE Defendant. Dkt. no. 106

I. INTRODUCTION On May 10, 2024, Defendant filed a Motion for Protective Order, dkt. no. 106, providing evidence that Plaintiff has continued to engage in abusive and harassing litigation tactics and to ignore this Court’s Orders addressing that conduct. On May 30, 2024, the Court issued a Second Order to Show Cause Why Case Should Not be Dismissed With Prejudice, dkt. no. 113 (“Second OSC”), with a response deadline of June 14, 2024. Plaintiff filed a response to the Second OSC on June 10, 2024; Defendant filed a response on July 18, 2024. Plaintiff did not file a response to the Motion for Protective Order; nor did Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.