Michel

Michel v. Sumo Logic, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20245:23-cv-03665California935 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JOSEPH MICHEL, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03665-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. CLARIFICATION

SUMO LOGIC, INC., et al., [Re: ECF No. 37] Defendants.

This is a putative class action alleging violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) against Sumo Logic, Inc. (“Sumo Logic”), Ramin Sayar, and Stewart Grierson (“Defendants”). ECF No. 18 (“Amended Complaint” or “AC”). On June 28, 2024, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss. ECF No. 36 (“MTD Order”). Plaintiffs have filed a motion for clarification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a). ECF No. 37 (“Mot.”); ECF No. 39 (“Reply”). Defendants oppose. ECF No. 38 (“Opp.”). For the reasons explained below, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Clarification is GRANTED. 1 “Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, a court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.