Spurlock

Spurlock v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20243:23-cv-04429California5,978 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WALTER SPURLOCK, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04429-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Re: Dkt. No. 47 FRANCISCO, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Defendants’ motion to dismiss was heard before this Court on July 3, 2024. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered their arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion, for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND1 Plaintiffs Walter Spurlock and Andre Guibert were Aviation Maintenance Technicians at San Francisco International Airport (“SFO,” or “the Airport”), employed by Alaska Airlines, Inc. Second Am. Compl. (ECF 43, “SAC”) ¶ 1. The pair sue Defendants the City and County of San Francisco, the Airport Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, Keaboka Molwane in his individual capacity and official capacity as Aviation Security…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.