Schultz

Schultz v. The Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20243:20-cv-04058California433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRENDAN SCHULTZ, Case No. 20-cv-04058-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS AT

GOVERNMENT EXPENSE

THE HARRY S. TRUMAN

SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION,

11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is plaintiff’s “Motion for Transcripts at Government Expense,” filed July 11, 2024. Defendant has filed a response, to which plaintiff has replied. Having read and considered the parties’ respective written submissions, the Court rules as follows. Plaintiff proceeds in the instant action pro se and in forma pauperis. His claims were tried to the Court in a six-day bench trial. By the instant motion, he seeks an order directing the court reporter to furnish him with a copy of the “complete trial transcript” (see Motion at 1:21), $850 of the cost to be paid by plaintiff and the balance to be paid by the United States. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753, a party appealing in forma pauperis is entitled to a transcript of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.