McClean

McClean v. Solano/Napa Counties Electrical Workers Profit Sharing Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20243:23-cv-01054California10,621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RODNEY McCLEAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01054-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 35 SOLANO/NAPA COUNTIES

ELECTRICAL WORKERS PROFIT

SHARING PLAN, et al., Defendants.

14 In this ERISA benefits action, two motions to dismiss, each filed by a different set of defendants, are currently pending before the Court. The Court held a hearing on the motions on June 27, 2024. Having considered the arguments advanced by counsel during that hearing, together with the parties’ papers, and the relevant legal authority, the Court resolves the motions as set forth below. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background1 1. The Parties a. Plaintiffs Plaintiff Rodney McClean worked as an electrician since 1974 and has been a member of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“IBEW”) since that time. ECF 31 ¶ 1.

1 This factual background is taken from the allegations in the operative complaint,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.