Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 AMOS JONES, Case No. 22-cv-00773-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 52, 57, 58 I. PEREZ-PANTOJA, et al., Defendants.

11 Pending before the Court are the parties’ motions in limine. ECF Nos. 52, 57, 58. The Court heard oral argument on August 8, 2024 and now issues the following order.1 I. JOINT MOTIONS IN LIMINE (ECF NO. 58) A. Evidence that the State of California May Pay the Judgment or Reimburse Defendants 16 The parties request the Court exclude evidence that the State of California may pay the judgment or reimburse Defendants in the event a judgment is entered against them. ECF No. 58 at 1. The State of California is generally required to indemnify its employees, at their request, in litigation arising from the course and scope of their employment. Cal. Gov’t Code § 825. But the State is not obligated to indemnify its employees for exemplary damages. Id. § 825(b). “Evidence of…