Morilha

Morilha v. Alphabet Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20244:24-cv-02793California522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL VITOR MORILHA, Case No. 24-cv-02793-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

ADMINSTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

ALPHABET INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 35 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s administrative motion to seal an affidavit and accompanying exhibits in support of his civil complaint. ECF No. 35. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. A party seeking to seal a document filed with the court must (1) comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and (2) rebut the “strong presumption in favor of access” that applies to most judicial records. Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). Local Rule 79-5 requires that the request include “a specific statement of the applicable legal standard and the reasons for keeping a document under seal,” and that it be “narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c). For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.