Noel

Noel v. Roblox Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20243:24-cv-00963California4,303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAYMOND NOEL, et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-00963-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND

MOTION TO DISMISS AND

ROBLOX CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 26, 28,

12 Raymond and Laura Noel’s minor children are regular users of the Roblox gaming platform. The Noels (the parents) bring a putative class action against Roblox Corporation (“Roblox”), alleging Roblox’s conduct is deceptive and unfair. Now pending before the Court is Roblox’s motion to compel Plaintiffs to arbitration (Dkt. No. 26)1, or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint (Dkt. No. 28), along with a motion to seal certain documents. (Dkt. No. 25.) In addition, a week before the oral hearing, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 39), which also remains pending. Having carefully considered the briefing, and with the benefit or oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.