Barrera

Barrera v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20243:24-cv-02403California2,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARTURO OSIEL VALENCIA BARRERA, Case No. 24-cv-02403-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IFP

v. APPLICATION; SCREENING

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF § 1915(E); DENYING MOTION TO

INVESTIGATION, DISQUALIFY

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 6, 12 12 On April 23, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket Nos. 1 (“Compl.”), 2.] Having considered Plaintiff’s papers, the court grants the IFP application and finds that the complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff must file a first amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies identified in this screening order by August 29, 2024. In addition, Plaintiff has filed a request for judicial notice and ex parte motion [Docket No. 6] and a motion to disqualify this judge under 28 U.S.C. § 455 [Docket No. 12]. For the reasons …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.