Jones
Jones v. Perez-Pantoja
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 AMOS JONES, Case No. 22-cv-00773-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE
v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 52, 57, 58 I. PEREZ-PANTOJA, et al., Defendants.
11 Prior to the August 8, 2024 pretrial conference, the Court issues the following order tentative order regarding the parties’ motions in limine. ECF Nos. 52, 57, 58. The parties shall be prepared to discuss any objections or comments at the conference.1 I. JOINT MOTIONS IN LIMINE (ECF NO. 58) A. Evidence that the State of California May Pay the Judgment or Reimburse Defendants 17 The parties request the Court exclude evidence that the State of California may pay the judgment or reimburse Defendants in the event a judgment is entered against them. ECF No. 58 at 1. The State of California is generally required to indemnify its employees, at their request, in litigation arising from the course and scope of their employment. Cal. Gov’t Code § 825. But the State is not…