Gaddis

Gaddis v. Moseley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20245:22-cv-01680California3,508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARRYL GADDIS, Case No. 22-cv-01680-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RAMIREZ, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendants.

12 Darryl Gaddis, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Mr. Gaddis alleges that Defendants Ramirez and Cruz, both officers at Salinas Valley State Prison, were deliberately indifferent to Mr. Gaddis’s health and safety needs by failing to secure a wheelchair-compatible van to transport him to a medical appointment. Defendants have moved for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 21 (“MSJ”). Mr. Gaddis filed an opposition and Defendants filed a reply. Dkt. Nos. 30 (“Opposition”), 31 (“Reply”). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise indicated. At all relevant times, Mr. Gaddis was incarcerated at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.