Habte

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBEL KIROS HABTE,

Case No. 24-cv-04236-JCS Plaintiff, 8 Vv. ORDER FOR BRIEFING

EMILIA M. BARDINI, et al., Defendants. 11 qg

The parties have filed a stipulation to transfer venue in this case to the Central District of

v California under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Dkt. no. 10. In determining whether a Section 1404(a)

|| transfer is appropriate, the court must undertake an “individualized, case-by-case consideration of a convenience and fairness.” See Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc., 211 F.3d 495, 498 (9th Cir.

= || 2000). In doing so, “the court must evaluate the appropriate factors even though the parties now

stipulate to the transfer.” Tung Tai Grp. v. Fla. Transformer, Inc., No. 5:11—cv—02389 EJD(HRL), |) 2011 WL 3471400, at *2 (N.D.Cal. Aug. 8, 2011) (citing White v. ABCO Eng'g Corp., 199 F.3d 140, 144 (3d Cir.1999)). Accordingly, the parties are requested to submit a joint brief,…