Reyna

Reyna v. City of Santa Cruz

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20243:23-cv-03121California5,978 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RHONDA E REYNA, Plaintiff, No. 23-cv-03121-WHA

v.

ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants.

10 INTRODUCTION In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, pro se plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint so long as it complied with several rulings which were outlined in a screening order (Dkt. No. 17). For the following reasons, this order finds that the amendments to the complaint are futile and therefore the first amended complaint is DENIED. The complaint is hereby DISMISSED. STATEMENT Pro se plaintiff Rhonda Reyes originally filed her Section 1983 complaint against 49 defendants, who included judicial and prosecutorial officials, alleging a conspiracy over her loss of custody of her daughter, who was a minor when the complaint was originally filed. The original complaint provided an account of events spanning from 2014 to 2023 in which the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.