Salazar

Salazar v. Victoria's Secret & Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20243:23-cv-06654California2,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VIVIAN SALAZAR, Case No. 23-cv-06654-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS

VICTORIA'S SECRET & CO., Defendant.

12 Before the Court is defendant Victoria's Secret & Co.'s ("Victoria's Secret") Motion, filed June 5, 2024, "to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint." Plaintiff Vivian Salazar ("Salazar") has filed opposition, to which Victoria's Secret has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND The following factual allegations, set forth in the First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), are assumed true for purposes of the instant motion. Salazar is a "visually impaired and legally blind person who requires screen reading software to read website content using her computer." (See FAC ¶ 1.) Victoria's Secret operates "physical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.