Flickinger

Flickinger v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20245:24-cv-02915California1,659 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASON ARCHIE FLICKINGER, Case No. 24-cv-02915-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART EX PARTE

MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE

JAQUELINE REYES CASTILLO, et al., SERVICE AND TO EXTEND

TIME TO SERVE

Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 8 12 Despite three-months’ worth of attempts to serve 37 Defendants, self-represented Plaintiff 13 remains unable to serve them by his deadline for service. He now moves ex parte for the Court to 14 extend his time to serve Defendants and permit service via alternative means, specifically, by 15 publication on a website. See Dkt. 8 (the “Motion”). The Court has determined that the Motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). After considering the Motion, relevant law and the record in this action, and for the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff commenced this action on May 14, 2024, and subsequently filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.