Estavillo

Estavillo v. Cortese

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20245:23-cv-04032California247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 4 ERIK ESTAVILLO, Case No. 23-cv-04032-VKD Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

Vv. DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

DAVE CORTESE, et al., Defendants.

v On July 16, 2024, the Court re-set the deadline for Mr. Estavillo to file an amended

|} complaint to August 6, 2024. Dkt. No. 46. The Court’s order stated that Mr. Estavillo’s “failure 16 || to comply with court-ordered deadlines may result in the dismissal of this case for his lack of

= 17 || attention to it and failure to prosecute this matter.” Jd. The docket indicates that Mr. Estavillo has

18 || not filed an amended complaint. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the 20 || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 || (1962). By August 23, 2024, Mr. Estavillo shall file a written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.