Jackson v. LinkedIn Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20245:24-cv-00812California4,037 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JACQUELINE JACKSON, Case No. 24-cv-00812-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS IN PART

LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Jacqueline Jackson brings this class action data privacy lawsuit against defendant LinkedIn Corporation alleging that LinkedIn used its Insight Tag (also known as the LinkedIn Pixel) to unlawfully obtain and use personal disability information from LinkedIn users visiting the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) website. LinkedIn moves to dismiss the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(7) for failure to join the DMV as a necessary party and under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. For the following reasons, the Court denies the Rule 12(b)(7) motion but grants the Rule 12(b)(6) motion in part and with leave to amend. BACKGROUND Jackson is a California resident who has been a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.