Merritt

Merritt v. Housing and Urban Development

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20243:24-cv-03968California744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARDY MERRITT, Case No. 24-cv-03968-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT WITHOUT FURTHER

LEAVE TO AMEND; DIRECTIONS TO

HOUSING AND URBAN CLERK

DEVELOPMENT, CITY OF BERKELEY

(Health, Housing and Human Services),

SHELTERPLUS CARE DEPARTMENT

AND PROGRAM, SB MANN 3 LLC Defendants.

14 By order filed July 16, 2024 ("July 16 Order"), the Court granted plaintiff Ardy Merritt's ("Merritt") application to proceed in forma pauperis and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), dismissed Merritt's complaint, for failure to state a claim; the Court afforded Merritt leave to amend. Now before the Court is Merritt's amended complaint, titled "Amended Breach of Contract[,] Fraudulent Enforcement of Contract" ("AC"), and an affidavit in support thereof, both filed July 26, 2024. Where, as here, a party proceeds in forma pauperis, the district court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.