Faizi

Faizi v. Temori

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20245:22-cv-04224California953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, an individual Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD and derivatively on behalf of FALAFEL FLAME, INC., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S Plaintiff, REQUEST FOR FEES AND COSTS v. Re: Dkt. No.

BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Defendants. 13 Mr. Faizi, on behalf of Falafel Flame, Inc. (“Falafel Flame”), previously filed a second motion for an order of contempt regarding defendants Baktash Temori, Masoud Rustakhis, Falafel Flame Hayward, Falafel Flame Sunnyvale, Falafel Flame San Jose, and Falafel Flame Upland. Dkt. No. 70. That motion focused on orders based on the Lanham Act claim (claim 1), which Mr. Faizi asserted derivatively on behalf of Falafel Flame. Id. Mr. Faizi requested, among other things, an award of attorneys’ fees incurred in bringing the second motion re contempt “in an amount according to proof.” See Dkt. No. 70-1 at 12, 14; Dkt. No. 70-3 at 1. In its order on that second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.