Fink-Carver

Fink-Carver v. Kuhn

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20244:21-cv-00664California4,360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

NOAH G. BLECHMAN (State Bar No. 197167) noah.blechman@mcnamaralaw.com MCNAMARA,NEY,BEATTY,SLATTERY,

BORGES &AMBACHER LLP

3480 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 250 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone: (925) 939-5330 Facsimile: (925) 939-0203 5 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF PLEASANT HILL and OFFICER KUHN 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER FINK-CARVER and JASON Case No. C21-00664 JSW

FINK,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] Plaintiffs, ORDER TO VACATE UNLAWFUL ENTRY RULING IN LIGHT OF vs. TENTATIVE SETTLEMENT 14 CITY OF PLEASANT HILL POLICE Re: Dkt. No. 69 OFFICER KUHN, CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, and, DOES 1-20, 16 Defendants. 17 18 The parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and jointly request and move for an order from the Court to vacate only a portion of the Court’s prior Order Resolving Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (“Order,” ECF No. 62), per the good cause reasons stated in detail below and in light of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.