Hermanson

Hermanson v. Lenovo Group Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20244:23-cv-05890California730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARK HERMANSON, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05890-JSW

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 62 LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, et al., Defendants.

12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss or to stay filed by Defendant Lenovo (United States), Inc. (“Lenovo”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court VACATES the hearing set for November 1, 2024, and GRANTS Lenovo’s motion. The Court will not repeat the background of this or the related litigation, which is set forth in its previous Order granting, in part, and denying, in part, Lenovo’s first motion to stay. After the Court issued that Order, the Plaintiffs in the related Axelrod case sought – and obtained - discovery on “Est Value” on the basis that it was relevant to show Lenovo’s deceptive advertising …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.