Hermanson
Hermanson v. Lenovo Group Limited
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARK HERMANSON, et al., Case No. 23-cv-05890-JSW
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
STAY
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 62 LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, et al., Defendants.
12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss or to stay filed by Defendant Lenovo (United States), Inc. (“Lenovo”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and finds the motion suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court VACATES the hearing set for November 1, 2024, and GRANTS Lenovo’s motion. The Court will not repeat the background of this or the related litigation, which is set forth in its previous Order granting, in part, and denying, in part, Lenovo’s first motion to stay. After the Court issued that Order, the Plaintiffs in the related Axelrod case sought – and obtained - discovery on “Est Value” on the basis that it was relevant to show Lenovo’s deceptive advertising …