O'Malley
Clark v. O'Malley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON C., Case No. 23-cv-04966-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 21 Social Security, 15 Defendant.
17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Aaron C. moves for summary judgment to reverse the decision of Defendant Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. ECF No. 17. Defendant cross- moves to affirm. ECF No. 21. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the matter is submitted without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion and GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion.2
26 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial 27 Conference of the United States.…