Ramos
Ramos v. Nielsen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CRISTA RAMOS, et al., Case No. 18-cv-01554-EMC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
v. FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Docket No. 228 Defendants.
12 13 The Court DEFERS ruling on Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and STAYS proceedings pending a decision by the Supreme Court in Lackey v. Stinnie, No. No. 23-621. The Court exercises its discretion to stay pursuant to Landis v. North Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248 (1936). See 23andMe, Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA, LLC, No. 18-cv-02791-EMC, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 188327, at *7 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2018) (noting that “Landis is generally applied where there is a request to stay proceedings pending a decision in a different case”) (emphasis in original). Compare Index Newspapers LLC v. United States Marshals Serv., 977 F.3d 817, 824 (9th Cir. 2020) (indicating that the standard for a stay as articulated in Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009), applies where the issue is…