Affinity Credit Union v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AFFINITY CREDIT UNION, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04174-JSW Plaintiffs,
ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL
Vv. BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFFS’
STANDING TO OBJECT TO ABSENT
APPLE INC., CLASS MEMBER SUBPOENAS Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.
In their joint letter brief, (Dkt. No. 80), the parties do not engage meaningfully with the
|| question of Plaintiffs’ standing to challenge the “Large Issuer” subpoenas. Parties generally lack || standing to challenge subpoenas issued to third parties. Kowalski v. Tesmer, 543 U.S. 125, 130 GQ 16 || (2004). The Court has determined that additional briefing on this limited issue is necessary.
Each side may submit a brief of up to seven pages in length regarding whether Plaintiffs Z || have standing for their challenge. The briefs shall be filed no later than August 23, 2024. No || response or reply briefs will be considered…