Sinek
Sinek v. United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CHARLES R. SINEK, Case No. 23-cv-04352-VKD
Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
13 Charles R. Sinek, who is presently serving a sentence of supervised release, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, asserting that he is entitled to time credits under the First Step Act to reduce the term of his supervised release. Dkt. No. 1 at ECF 2. Finding he stated a cognizable claim, the Court ordered Respondent to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not issue. Dkt. No. 5. All parties consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. See Dkt. Nos. 4, 9. On January 5, 2024, Respondent filed its answer, supported by the declaration of Daniel Painter, the Bureau of Prison’s Residential Reentry Manager (“RRM”) for the Sacramento Office. Dkt. Nos. 7, 7-1 ¶¶ 1-2. Mr. Sinek did not file a response, although…