Hutchinson
Hutchinson v. Musk
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 LEONNA HUTCHINSON, Case No. 24-cv-04123-TSH Plaintiff, y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ELON R MUSK, et al., Defendants. 10 Plaintiff Leonna Hutchinson initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint (ECF No. 1) and 12 || application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). On July 10 the Court granted the application but found Plaintiffs complaint deficient under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). ECF No. 4. The 14 || Court directed Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint by August 9, 2024, warning that if || Plaintiff failed to cure the deficiencies, the case would be reassigned to a district judge with a a || recommendation for dismissal. Plaintiff has failed to respond.
The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 || (1962). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff…